Core Services - Working Sessions

Posted on June 11, 2009

WCRC logoThe Board of Road Commissioners has initiated a series of Working Sessions scheduled this spring to review our “Core Services”. The intent of this exercise is to evaluate all of the primary services and functions our agency performs to determine if we are consistently performing the essential tasks that support our statutory charge and agency mission. This review will entail an in-depth analysis of our various routine and capital investments to determine if we are on a financially sustainable path. The schedule for these Working Sessions is as follows:

March 17th.........Financial Overview
April 23rd...........Asset Management
May 20th...........Equipment & Facilities
June 23rd...........Employee / Contracted Services
July 20th............Proposed Sustainable Strategies
Sept. 22nd.........Core Services Adjustments

road equipmentThe timing of the Core Services review has been driven by the steadily decreasing amount of Michigan Transportation Funds we are receiving.  In fact, we are anticipating the same amount of revenue in 2009 as we received in 2000. Meanwhile, we have seen a 53% increase in our routine maintenance costs over this same period of time. It is not surprising that we have had to limit expenditures where possible to balance our budget. The real question is: Are we meeting our statutory obligations and spending our precious resources in such a way that preserves the overall road system to the best of our ability, or should we eliminate certain services in order to focus our remaining resources on essential services?

These are not easy questions for our Board to answer, so we have embarked on a series of Working Sessions over the next couple of months to determine the best path for our agency. This process will challenge our agency to balance primary roads versus local roads; roads versus bridges; paved roads versus gravel roads; bare roads versus snow covered roads; equipment replacements versus road investments; facility improvements versus road investments, and employee costs versus contracted services.

The Road Commission recognizes that the public has entrusted our agency to be good stewards of the public resources; we are committed to providing the public with the most cost effective method to “maintain a reasonably safe and convenient road system”.

See published Working Sessions: